Preoperative Angiography for Free Fibula Flap Harvest: A Case Series.

Purpose: To assess if preoperative angiography of the lower extremity is necessary to detect abnormalities that alter operative planning of a free fibula flap (FFF). The secondary objective is to determine whether abnormalities are identified on physical examination. Methods: A retrospective case series of patients receiving preoperative lower extremity angiography for FFF was performed. Between November 2004 and July 2016, patients assessed for FFF reconstruction by a single surgeon were reviewed. Outcomes analyzed were preoperative physical examination, angiography findings, changes in operative plan, and perioperative complications including flap failure and limb ischemia. Level of agreement between physical examination and angiography findings was analyzed. Results: A total of 132 consecutive patients were assessed for FFF, of which 70 met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 60.9 (range: 22-88) years old. All patients underwent aortic angiogram runoff, except for 2 who received computed tomography angiography. The surgical plan was altered based on angiography findings in 9 (12.9%) patients, and 7 (77.8%) of these cases had a normal physical examination. A further 6 (8.6%) patients had physical examination findings precluding the use of FFF, whereas imaging demonstrated the contrary. Physical examination demonstrated low predictability of aberrant vascular anatomy, with a sensitivity of 22.2%. There were no limb ischemia complications. Conclusions: Routine preoperative angiography of the lower extremity for all patients being evaluated for FFF is important to ensure safety and success of the procedure. Physical examination alone is insufficient to detect vascular abnormalities that may result in limb or flap compromise.

Objectif: Évaluer s'il faut procéder à une angiographie préopératoire de l'extrémité inférieure pour déceler des anomalies qui perturbent le plan opératoire en vue du prélèvement d'un lambeau libre de la fibula (ou péroné, LLF). L'objectif secondaire consiste à déterminer si des anomalies sont décelées à l'examen physique. Méthodologie: Les chercheurs ont examiné une série rétrospective de cas ayant subi une angiographie préopératoire de l'extrémité inférieure en vue du prélèvement d'un LLF. Ils ont examiné les patients évalués en vue d'une reconstruction par LLF effectuée par un même chirurgien entre novembre 2004 et juillet 2016. Ils ont analysé l'examen physique préopératoire, les résultats de l'angiographie, les modifications au plan opératoire et les complications périopératoires, y compris l'échec du lambeau et l'ischémie du membre. Enfin, ils ont analysé le degré de convergence entre l'examen physique et les résultats de l'angiographie. Résultats: Les chercheurs ont évalué 132 patients en vue du prélèvement d'un LLF, dont 70 respectaient les critères d'inclusion. Ils avaient un âge moyen de 60,9 ans (plage de 22 à 88 ans). Tous les patients ont subi une angiographie aortique détaillée, sauf deux qui ont subi une angiographie par tomodensitométrie. Le plan opératoire a été modifié en raison des observations angiographiques chez neuf patients (12,9 %), et l'examen physique était normal pour sept d'entre eux (77,8 %). Chez six autres patients (8,6 %), l'examen physique écartait le prélèvement du LLF, mais l'imagerie démontrait le contraire. L'examen physique a établi la faible prévisibilité des aberrations de l'anatomie vasculaire, selon une sensibilité de 22,2 %. Aucune complication ischémique des membres n'a été observée. Conclusions: Il est important de procéder à une angiographie préopératoire systématique de l'extrémité inférieure chez tous les patients évalués en vue du prélèvement d'un LLF pour garantir la sécurité et la réussite de l'intervention. L'examen physique seul ne suffit pas pour déceler les anomalies vasculaires susceptibles d'entraîner une atteinte du membre ou du lambeau.

Medial femoral trochlea flap reconstruction: Clinical outcomes and perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: We report our experience with use of the medial femoral trochlea (MFT) osteochondral flap for carpal applications. METHODS: Outcomes of all patients treated with MFT flaps were reviewed. Healing, range of motion, grip strength, carpal alignment, pain, and complication data were collected. RESULTS: MFT flaps were performed on seven patients with a mean age of 26.1 (range, 17-42) years. Indications included scaphoid proximal pole nonunion (n = 3), Kienböck's disease (n = 3), and Preiser's disease (n = 1). The mean follow-up was 32.3 (range, 5-70) months. Union was achieved in five patients at a mean of 12 (range 6-22) weeks. All five patients had increased grip strength and absence of pain at follow-up. There were two failures due to graft resorption. CONCLUSIONS: The MFT osteochondral flap is a technically challenging yet powerful tool to replace the loss of both carpal articular cartilage and adjacent bone.

The Biomechanical Consequences of Trapeziectomy and Partial Trapezoidectomy in the Treatment of Thumb Carpometacarpal and Scaphotrapeziotrapezoid Arthritis.

PURPOSE: To determine, using a biomechanical cadaveric model, whether, in the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal and scaphotrapeziotrapezoid arthritis, partial trapezoid resection following trapeziectomy causes carpal, specifically lunocapitate and scapholunate, instability. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen mid-forearm cadaver specimens with type I lunates and devoid of basilar thumb arthritis were used in the study. Specimens were mounted onto a wrist simulator applying cyclical wrist flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation motions. Carpal kinematics, specifically lunocapitate and scapholunate joint relationships, were measured at 4 different conditions: (1) a native intact state, (2) after trapeziectomy, (3) after 2-mm partial trapezoid resection, and (4) after 4-mm partial trapezoid resection. RESULTS: During both flexion/extension and radial/ulnar deviation of the wrist, the lunocapitate and scapholunate joint relationship did not show any notable change following any of trapeziectomy, 2-mm, or 4-mm trapezoid resection compared with the intact state. Changes to the lunocapitate and scapholunate angles were clinically insignificant-a maximum of 6° and 4° change, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This biomechanical cadaveric study shows that performing a trapeziectomy followed by up to 4 mm of proximal trapezoid resection has a negligible effect upon carpal, specifically lunocapitate and scapholunate, stability. Further research is needed to elucidate the long-term clinical consequences of limited trapezoid resection in vivo. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: There may be no clinically relevant effects of resection of up to 4 mm of trapezoid in the surgical management of combined basilar thumb and scaphotrapeziotrapezoid arthritis.

Distal Nerve Transfers to the Triceps Brachii Muscle: Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To report the clinical outcomes and describe the surgical technique of triceps muscle reinnervation using 2 different distal nerve transfers: the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) fascicle of the ulnar nerve and the posterior branch of the axillary nerve (PBAN) to the triceps nerve branch. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing FCU fascicle of ulnar nerve or PBAN to triceps nerve branch transfer was performed. Outcome measures included preoperative and postoperative modified British Medical Research Council (MRC) score, EMG results, and complications. RESULTS: Between September 2003 and April 2017, 6 patients were identified. Four patients with a traumatic upper trunk and posterior cord palsy underwent ulnar nerve fascicle to triceps nerve transfer. Two patients with a recovering upper trunk following a pan-brachial plexus palsy underwent PBAN to triceps nerve branch transfer. The median age was 30.0 years (range, 18-68 years). Surgery was performed at a median of 6.9 months (range, 5.0-8.9 months) postinjury, with a median follow-up of 18.4 months (range, 7.6-176.3) months. Before surgery, 4 patients exhibited grade M0 and 2 patients exhibited grade M1 triceps strength. Four patients had M5 donor muscle strength and 2 had grade M4. Postoperatively, 4 patients regained MRC grade M4 triceps muscle strength, 1 regained M3, and 1 regained M2. There was no noticeable donor muscle weakness. CONCLUSIONS: Nerve fascicles to the FCU and PBAN are viable options for obtaining meaningful triceps muscle recovery in a select group of patients. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.

Preoperative Angiography for Free Fibula Flap Harvest: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The necessity for routine preoperative imaging for free fibula harvest is controversial. The primary objective of this meta-analysis is to determine if lower extremity angiography is necessary to detect abnormalities that may alter flap selection. The secondary objective is to determine if physical examination alone is sufficient to predict these abnormalities. METHODS: A literature search was performed using Cochrane, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE. Studies were selected for inclusion if they included patients undergoing free fibula flap harvest with preoperative imaging, with or without physical examination findings. Data extraction was performed independently and in duplicate, including a change in flap selection and the level of agreement between physical examination and imaging. Pooled proportions were calculated using a random-effects model and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included for analysis. Mean sample size was 42 patients (range: 5-123). Included studies were of low methodologic quality. Pooled proportion of patients who had flap selection change secondary to abnormalities identified on preoperative angiography was 20.1% (95% CI: 9.6-33.2%). A pooled proportion of 71.5% (95% CI: 5-88.7%) of cases requiring change in flap selection was missed by physical examination findings alone. CONCLUSION: There is low-quality evidence suggesting a necessity for routine preoperative angiography for all patients undergoing free fibula flap harvest. Physical examination alone is insufficient in detecting vascular abnormalities that may result in limb compromise or an inability to successfully harvest a free fibula. Further investigation is warranted for cost-effectiveness of preoperative imaging protocols.

One Versus 2 Venous Anastomoses in Free Flap Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The necessity of a second venous anastomosis in free flap surgery is controversial. The purpose of this systematic review is to determine whether venous flap failure and reoperation rates are lower when 2 venous anastomoses are performed. The secondary objective is to determine whether venous flap failure and reoperation rates are lower when the 2 veins are from 2 different drainage systems. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature identified relevant studies. Investigators independently extracted data on rates of flap failure and reoperation secondary to venous congestion. A meta-analysis was performed; odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using a random-effects model and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Of 18 190 studies identified, 15 were included for analysis. The mean sample size was 287 patients (minimum = 102, maximum = 564). No statistically significant difference in venous flap failure was found when comparing 1 versus 2 venous anastomoses (OR: 1.35; 95% CI: 0.46-3.93). A significant decrease in reoperation rate due to venous congestion was shown (OR: 3.03; 95% CI: 1.64-5.58). The results favor using 2 veins from 2 different systems over veins from the same system (OR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.02-1.27). CONCLUSIONS: There is low-quality evidence suggesting that the use of 2 venous anastomoses will lower the rate of reoperation due to venous congestion. There are insufficient data published to meaningfully compare outcomes of flaps with 2 venous anastomoses from different systems to flaps with anastomoses from the same system.

HISTORIQUE: La nécessité d'une deuxième anastomose veineuse lors d'une opération par lambeau libre est matière à controverse. La présente analyse systématique visait à déterminer si l'échec du lambeau veineux et le taux de réopération étaient plus faibles après deux anastomoses veineuses. L'objectif secondaire consistait à déterminer si l'échec du lambeau veineux et le taux de réopération étaient plus faibles lorsque les deux veines provenaient de deux systèmes de drainage différents. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Les chercheurs ont repéré les études pertinentes au moyen d'une recherche approfondie des publications. De manière indépendante, ils ont extrait les données sur le taux d'échec des lambeaux et des réopérations après une congestion veineuse. Ils ont procédé à une méta-analyse et ont regroupé les rapports de cote (RC) au moyen d'un modèle à effet aléatoire et d'intervalles de confiance (IC) à 95 %. RÉSULTATS: Sur les 18 190 études extraites, les chercheurs en ont inclus 15 dans l'analyse. Leur échantillon moyen était de 287 patients (minimum 102, maximum 564). Ils n'ont pas constaté de différence statistiquement significative des échecs des lambeaux lorsqu'ils comparaient une ou deux anastomoses veineuses (RC 1,35; IC à 95 % 0,46 à 3,93). Ils ont constaté une diminution significative du taux de réopérations attribuables à une congestion veineuse (RC 3,03; IC à 95 % 1,64 à 5,58). Les résultats favorisent le recours à deux veines de deux systèmes veineux différents plutôt que d'un même système (RC 0,16; IC à 95 % 0,02 à 1,27). CONCLUSIONS: Selon des preuves de faible qualité, le recours à deux anastomoses veineuses réduit le taux de réopérations attribuables à une congestion veineuse. Les données publiées sont insuffisantes pour comparer de manière significative les résultats des lambeaux de deux anastomoses provenant de systèmes différents à ceux des lambeaux provenant d'un même système.

Obstetrical brachial plexus injury: burden in a publicly funded, universal healthcare system.

OBJECT The aim of this study was to determine the volume and timing of referrals for obstetrical brachial plexus injury (OBPI) to multidisciplinary centers in a national demographic sample. Secondarily, we aimed to measure the incidence and risk factors for OBPI in the sample. The burden of OBPI has not been investigated in a publicly funded system, and the timing and volume of referrals to multidisciplinary centers are unknown. The incidence and risk factors for OBPI have not been established in Canada. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study. The authors used a demographic sample of all infants born in Canada, capturing all children born in a publicly funded, universal healthcare system. OBPI diagnoses and corresponding risk factors from 2004 to 2012 were identified and correlated with referrals to Canada's 10 multidisciplinary OBPI centers. Quality indicators were approved by the Canadian OBPI Working Group's guideline consensus group. The primary outcome was the timing of initial assessment at a multidisciplinary center, "good" if assessed by the time the patient was 1 month of age, "satisfactory" if by 3 months of age, and "poor" if thereafter. Joinpoint regression analysis was used to determine the OBPI incidence over the study period. Odds ratios were calculated to determine the strength of association for risk factors. RESULTS OBPI incidence was 1.24 per 1000 live births, and was consistent from 2004 to 2012. Potential biases underestimate the level of injury identification. The factors associated with a very strong risk for OBPI were humerus fracture, shoulder dystocia, and clavicle fracture. The majority (55%-60%) of OBPI patients identified at birth were not referred. Among those who were referred, the timing of assessment was "good" in 28%, "satisfactory" in 66%, and "poor" in 34%. CONCLUSIONS Shoulder dystocia was the strongest modifiable risk factor for OBPI. Most children with OBPI were not referred to multidisciplinary care. Of those who were referred, 72% were assessed later than the target quality indicator of 1 month that was established by the national guideline consensus group. A referral gap has been identified using quality indicators at clinically relevant time points; this gap should be addressed with the use of knowledge tools (e.g., a clinical practice guideline) to target variations in referral rates and clinical practice. Interventions should guide the referral process.

Primary Nerve Repair for Obstetrical Brachial Plexus Injury: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Nerve repair may be effective in improving function following obstetrical brachial plexus injury. No previous review has directly compared nerve repair to nonoperative management for similar patients, and no previous analysis has been adequately powered to determine whether nerve repair reduces impairment. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central). Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and case series (n > 9); included patients younger than 2 years undergoing nerve repair or nonoperative management of obstetrical brachial plexus injury; and reported functional impairment. Two reviewers independently screened articles using objective a priori criteria. Bias was assessed for each study. Overall quality of evidence was evaluated for each outcome. RESULTS: Among nine cohort studies including 222 patients, nerve repair significantly reduced functional impairment compared with nonoperative management (relative risk, 0.58; 95 percent CI, 0.43 to 0.79; p < 0.001; I = 0 percent; absolute risk reduction, 19 percent; number needed to treat, six). Findings are consistent with comparison of similar patients from case series. With operative management, no deaths were reported; major adverse events were reported in 1.5 percent, and minor adverse events were reported in 5.0 percent of cases. Among demographic (all severities) samples managed nonoperatively, residual impairment remains in 27 percent (19 to 36 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Nerve repair reduces functional impairment in obstetrical brachial plexus injury. Nonoperative management in patients with a deficit at 3 months of age leads to a high proportion of functional impairment. Mortality is not a common risk of modern pediatric microsurgical nerve repair. Residual impairment with nonoperative management is underestimated in the reported literature. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

A systematic review of utilities in hand surgery literature.

PURPOSE: To systematically review the literature to determine if utilities (a quantitative way to express patient preferences for health outcomes) have been measured in hand surgery studies. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using Cochrane, EMBASE, HealthSTAR, MEDLINE, and CINAHL electronic databases (1966-2013). This search was supplemented by cited and manual reference searches and expert consultation to retrieve all relevant studies. Studies were selected by 2 independent reviewers if they pertained to hand or wrist surgery, were published in English, and measured utilities as an outcome. Descriptive data were extracted, including the hand surgery procedure investigated, study design, value of utilities, and methodology of utilities measurement. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included after reviewing 989 studies. Most hand conditions were associated with utilities less than 0.8. Utilities in the reviewed studies were measured using different methods and from different subjects. Three studies paradoxically mapped greater utilities for poorer heath states. CONCLUSIONS: Hand conditions cause impairment, as evidenced by their utilities. Measurement of utilities remains uncommon in hand surgery literature. Future studies should not only measure utilities but also do so with consistent and appropriate methodology to ensure that mapped values are valid and comparable. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic/decision analysis III.

The utility of hand transplantation in hand amputee patients.

PURPOSE: To measure the desirable health outcome, termed utility, and the expected quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained with hand composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA) using hand amputee patients and the general public. METHODS: Using the standard gamble (SG) and time trade-off (TTO) techniques, utilities were obtained from 30 general public participants and 12 amputee patients. The health utility and net QALYs gained or lost with transplantation were computed. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to account for the effects of lifelong immunosuppression on the life expectancy of transplant recipients. Higher scores represent greater utility. RESULTS: Hand amputation mean health utility as measured by the SG and TTO methods, respectively, was 0.72 and 0.80 for the general public and 0.69 and 0.70 for hand amputees. In comparison, hand CTA mean health utility was 0.74 and 0.82 for the general public and 0.83 and 0.86 for amputees. Hand CTA imparted an expected gain of 0.9 QALYs (SG and TTO) in the general public and 7.0 (TTO) and 7.8 (SG) QALYs in hand amputees. A loss of at least 1.7 QALYs was demonstrated when decreasing the life expectancy in the sensitivity analysis in the hand amputee group. CONCLUSIONS: Hand amputee patients did not show a preference toward hand CTA with its inherent risks. With this procedure being increasingly adopted worldwide, the benefits must be carefully weighed against the risks of lifelong immunosuppressive therapy. This study does not show clear benefit to advocate hand CTA.

Surgical preferences of patients at risk of hip fractures: hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in patients over 60 years is controversial. While much research has focused on the impact of total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) on surgical outcomes, little is known about patient preferences for either alternative. The purpose of this study was to elicit surgical preferences of patients at risk of sustaining hip fracture using a novel decision board. METHODS: We developed a decision board for the surgical management of displaced femoral neck fractures presenting risks and outcomes of HA and THA. The decision board was presented to 81 elderly patients at risk for developing femoral neck fractures identified from an osteoporosis clinic. The participants were faced with the scenario of sustaining a displaced femoral neck fracture and were asked to state their treatment option preference and rationale for operative procedure. RESULTS: Eighty-five percent (85%) of participants were between the age of 60 and 80 years; 89% were female; 88% were Caucasian; and 49% had some post-secondary education. Ninety-three percent (93%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 87-99%) of participants chose THA as their preferred operative choice. Participants identified several factors important to their decision, including the perception of greater walking distance (63%), less residual pain (29%), less reoperative risk (28%) and lower mortality risk (20%) with THA. Participants who preferred HA (7%; 95% CI, 1-13%) did so for perceived less invasiveness (50%), lower dislocation risk (33%), lower infection risk (33%), and shorter operative time (17%). CONCLUSION: The overwhelming majority of patients preferred THA to HA for the treatment of a displaced femoral neck fracture when confronted with risks and outcomes of both procedures on a decision board.

The Koebner phenomenon and breast reconstruction: Psoriasis eruption along the surgical incision.

The present report describes a recent case of recurrent infection in a breast reconstruction patient with a history of psoriasis. Following surgery, the patient developed psoriatic plaques along the incision scars. This phenomenon is known as Koebnerization, and has been found to affect surgical incisions. Cases of psoriatic patients being denied surgical procedures because of their inherent risk to Koebnerize have been previously reported. Similarly, such patients have been denied surgical procedures because of their increased risk of infection. The present case and literature review on this subject is described.